Released April 2003
Dallas, Texas -- One of the provisions of the No Child Left Behind
Act requires states to test all students in grades 3 through
8 by 2005-06. The goal of testing is to provide educators,
parents, and policy makers with better information to ensure that
every
child has the opportunity to learn. Many initiatives underway
involve states, districts, and software developers in the challenge
to not only secure accurate information, but analyze and deliver
it to the people who need it.
"Often times, you have your gut feeling about why a school
isn't making the progress that it should. Until you look at the
data, you don't
know," said Carla Wade, Education Specialist, Oregon Department
of Education.
Single System Pioneers
In 1997, the state of Oregon launched the Database Initiative
to coordinate school district financial reporting into a consistent,
electronic format. The project was much more than an accounting
exercise.
The legislature wanted to answer fundamental questions: what
is a quality education, what does it cost, and what do Oregonians
expect
from their public schools?
Through a phased approach, the state tackled financial information
first, and then began to integrate aggregated program and student
data.
"From that [the initial phase] it became clear that we needed
information at a more granular level, the student and staff level," recalls
Doug Kosty, Director of Technology and Information Resources
Management. "Now
we can look at school and district data, identify what programs
they've been served by, and look at results over time."
In 2002, all 200 school districts in the state participated
in the program, providing financial, student demographic and
performance,
infrastructure and other data. Districts can generate reports
from
the web-based system to review their data, compare it to other
schools, and access prototype schools drawn from the best practices
of all.
(http://dbi.ode.state.or.us/reports.htm) Oregon's Quality Education
Commission provides data analysis for legislative groups, the
governor's budget office, research entities, and nonprofits.
50 Different Starting Points
"Using data to make good decisions is not new," said Linda Roberts,
Educational Technology Consultant and former Director of the
Office of Technology for the U.S. Department of Education. "What is
new is the growing number of ways school leaders can collect
the data more easily and more effectively." School leaders have
to select appropriate and relevant information and metrics
for inclusion.
In November 2002, Roberts moderated a panel of State Education
Technology Directors at a Joint Forum convened by the Consortium
for School
Network (CoSN), the International Society for Technology in
Education (ISTE), and the State Education Technology Directors
Association
(SETDA) (http://www.iste.org/jointforum/index.cfm). She noted
the diversity of state structures and approaches to the task.
The 50
states have different constituents and circumstances, and operate
with different degrees of centralization and local control.
To help administrators find their way through the array of
options, CoSN launched the Data-driven Decision Making Initiative:
Vision
to Know and Do (www.3d2know.org) in February 2003. According
to Executive Director Keith Kruger, the site will offer "up-to-date,
unbiased information for educators on collecting, understanding
and using
data effectively."
District-level Engagement
As states develop systems to meet federal regulations and support
their own initiatives, districts grapple with ways to simplify
collection and streamline reporting. During roundtable discussions
at the Joint
Forum, public and private sector leaders discussed the conditions
necessary for data-driven decision making to take hold.
Doug Otto, Superintendent of the Plano Independent School District,
presented a model for effective organizational use of data-based
decision making (D3M). Plano joined with several high-performing
school districts to create the Western States Benchmarking
Consortium (www.wsbenchmark.org) and define elements of organizational
effectiveness.
Otto recommends that school districts collect quantitative
data with direct impact such as test scores, exit exams,
and other
methods
of assessment, as well as qualitative measures with indirect
impact (staff development satisfaction surveys, network usage,
helpdesk
ticket information). Plano uses the measures to allocate
resources and make informed decisions with broad input. In 2001, Columbia Public Schools, Missouri, integrated data
systems linking student demographic information with assessment,
attendance,
and other measures. The district hired a full-time data analyst
to extract data into reports. Rather than wade through a sea
of numbers,
principals and administrators can query the data analyst for
reports that meet their decision needs.
A Wider Circle of Influence
Beyond the school district and the legislature, ultimately
parents and their children will benefit from the ability to
make more
informed choices about education.
"We talk about giving parents more choice," said Roberts. "We
have to give them information about their choices and help
them become more engaged in communities to improve all of the schools
for all
of the students."
GreatSchools (www.greatschools.net),
a San Francisco-based nonprofit, provides parents and community
members with relevant
information
about any public school in the U.S. The mission of GreatSchools
is not to make data more available, but to offer parents
guidance on
what matters for their own child's education and how they
can advocate for educational excellence.
"We offer the tip of the pyramid," said GreatSchools CEO and
President Bill Jackson. "You have to boil it down
to simple metrics. You take all of the data and think carefully
about what
views shed light into the question that you are asking.
Parents may use data to better understand their child's
development or
to choose
a school to meet their needs."
The compare-and-contrast feature available in some states,
helps parents make sense of test scores, teacher experience,
student
to teacher ratios and other measures by putting them into
context with
similar schools. Many schools also have enhanced profiles
with details about the school's philosophies and special
programs.
Make It Count for Teachers and Students
Data-driven decision making promises to improve the quality
of education through the process of gathering data, analysis,
action,
and reassessment.
The stakes are high and teachers already feel tremendous
pressure meeting standards, integrating technology, and
responding to
individual needs of students without the added burden of
inputting information.
Successful systems provide teachers with timely feedback
and support.
"We're trying to fine tune ways for administrators, teachers
and eventually students to look at data about learning," said
Wade. "On
our site [http://www.ode.state.or.us/cifs/learningresource/],
for example, a teacher can look up a state mathematics standard
when
they want more information to support their instruction.
Up comes the content information, a sample lesson plan, skill checks,
sample
test items similar to the state wide assessment." Language
arts and science are next to be added to this resource.
Oregon also developed the Comprehensive School Review
process (http://www.ode.state.or.us/cifs/improvement/schoolreview/)
to help districts and schools with continuing improvement
efforts. Using well-defined quality indicators and a
review
process,
schools
gather and analyze a wide variety of data about how well
they function
as a learning environment. A review team visits the school
and later assists leaders with modifications and training
based on
their analysis.
According to Kosty, the process of implementing the Oregon
system was not all smooth sailing: "We stubbed our
toes quite a few times. Anything earth shaking? No. We
had everything from incorrect
definitions that had to be clarified to the servers going
down. We have 200 districts submitting data to the state
throughout the
year.
Decision-makers are very pleased with the information
they are getting." |